Council approves Resolution Protesting Red Cedar Corporation Annexation, 4–0

Resolution Protesting Red Cedar Corporation Annexation

4 yes, 0 no

Craig Whiting (yes), Brett Wright (yes), Zachory Huish (yes), Rich Wood (yes)

Site Plan - Spring Run Plaza Lot 2

5 yes, 0 no

Chad Decoursey (yes), Bryan Free (yes), Jason Allen (yes), Rod Hess (yes), Brent Strong (yes)

Second Amendment to the Brylee Farms Phase B Development Agreement

5 yes, 0 no

Rod Hess (yes), Chad Decoursey (yes), Bryan Free (yes), Brent Strong (yes), Jason Allen (yes)

Ordinance Amendment - Retaining Wall Construction Standards

5 yes, 0 no

Rod Hess (yes), Chad Decoursey (yes), Bryan Free (yes), Brent Strong (yes), Jason Allen (yes)

Preliminary Plat - Gateway Park Phase 3

5 yes, 0 no

Rod Hess (yes), Jason Allen (yes), Brent Strong (yes), Chad Decoursey (yes), Bryan Free (yes)

Site Plan - Spring Run Plaza Lot 1

5 yes, 0 no

Rod Hess (yes), Jason Allen (yes), Chad Decoursey (yes), Bryan Free (yes), Brent Strong (yes)

August 11, 2026, Planning Commission Minutes

5 yes, 0 no

Red Cedar Corporation Annexation

A petition by Red Cedar Corporation to annex land into the Town of Cedar Fort.

Discussed — no decision yet

Gateway Park Phase 3

Preliminary plat for a three-lot development.

approved · still approved

Spring Run Plaza

Northeast corner of Cory B. Wride Memorial Highway and Spring Run Parkway

Site plan for a new commercial lot.

approved · still approved

Brylee Farms Phase B

Amendment to the development agreement to allow for two-story units with larger garages.

approved · still approved

Slope Development Regulations

The city is updating rules for retaining walls to make them safer and clearer. This affects homeowners and developers by setting new height limits and requiring engineering for taller walls.

What it means: Residents benefit from safer, better-engineered walls that are less likely to fail.

City Growth Management

Eagle Mountain is challenging a neighboring town's attempt to annex land that Eagle Mountain wants to include in its own future growth plans. The city claims the petition is illegal because it doesn't have enough support from the actual landowners.

What it means: Local landowners who do not wish to be annexed into Cedar Fort.