Lower Hidden Valley Master Development Plan Amendment
Eagle Mountain City
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 7
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Nov 18, 2025.
Public comments (7)
Representing the White Birch Drive Citizen Group, urged the Council to reject the amendment, citing phasing loopholes, slope violations, and unauthorized dumping on Pod P4.
City Council - Nov 18, 2025 · 2:50:03 →Speaking for the Eagle Mountain Nature Wildlife Alliance, thanked Perry Homes for cooperating on wildlife corridor preservation and requested city support for funding engineering bridges.
City Council - Nov 18, 2025 · 2:53:23 →Expressed serious concerns about building triplexes in Pod P4 on slopes exceeding 25%, stating it violates city code and the development agreement.
Planning Commission - Oct 28, 2025 · 47:43 →Representing the White Birch Drive Citizen Group, he urged the commission to deny the re-phasing request and address slope and discovery concerns.
Planning Commission - Oct 28, 2025 · 51:02 →Highlighted emotional and logistical concerns, warning that high-density units behind his property would damage property values and create erosion risks.
Planning Commission - Oct 28, 2025 · 56:06 →Expressed safety fears regarding children playing near heavy construction equipment, increased neighborhood traffic, and dust.
Planning Commission - Oct 28, 2025 · 59:30 →Speaking for the Eagle Mountain Nature and Wildlife Alliance, she thanked developers for corridor space but requested MOUs, fencing updates, and monument relocations.
Planning Commission - Oct 28, 2025 · 1:02:37 →