O
Eagle Mountain City
← Community
DevelopmentCommunity discussion

Lower Hidden Valley Master Development Plan Amendment

Eagle Mountain City

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (1)Opposed (5)Concerned (1)

At a glance

Public comments
7
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Nov 18, 2025.

Public comments (7)

OpposedChris TurnerNov 18, 2025

Representing the White Birch Drive Citizen Group, urged the Council to reject the amendment, citing phasing loopholes, slope violations, and unauthorized dumping on Pod P4.

City Council - Nov 18, 2025 · 2:50:03 →
SupportiveBettina CameronNov 18, 2025

Speaking for the Eagle Mountain Nature Wildlife Alliance, thanked Perry Homes for cooperating on wildlife corridor preservation and requested city support for funding engineering bridges.

City Council - Nov 18, 2025 · 2:53:23 →
OpposedCorey JepsonOct 28, 2025

Expressed serious concerns about building triplexes in Pod P4 on slopes exceeding 25%, stating it violates city code and the development agreement.

Planning Commission - Oct 28, 2025 · 47:43 →
OpposedChristopher TurnerOct 28, 2025

Representing the White Birch Drive Citizen Group, he urged the commission to deny the re-phasing request and address slope and discovery concerns.

Planning Commission - Oct 28, 2025 · 51:02 →
OpposedJoshua HallOct 28, 2025

Highlighted emotional and logistical concerns, warning that high-density units behind his property would damage property values and create erosion risks.

Planning Commission - Oct 28, 2025 · 56:06 →
OpposedShandarae HallOct 28, 2025

Expressed safety fears regarding children playing near heavy construction equipment, increased neighborhood traffic, and dust.

Planning Commission - Oct 28, 2025 · 59:30 →
ConcernedBettina CameronOct 28, 2025

Speaking for the Eagle Mountain Nature and Wildlife Alliance, she thanked developers for corridor space but requested MOUs, fencing updates, and monument relocations.

Planning Commission - Oct 28, 2025 · 1:02:37 →